except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 17:40 on April 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed an insulting dispute with the denied Party C at the anti-fel parking lot located in the Ansan-si, Ansan-si, the members of Ansan-si, 85, which was reported to the said C; (b) the Defendant was subject to fighting from the victim slope E belonging to the police box of the Gyeonggi-do Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving the said C’s communication report; (c) and (d) the Defendant told the victim during the said C’s hearing, saying, “I flick, v., and this spath.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

2. When the Defendant received a warning to the police officer who continued to appear at the scene from the victim E’s slope belonging to the Raba Police Station of the Gyeonggian District Police Station, where the Defendant and C had a verbal dispute with him/her at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), he/she could be arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of insult. As such, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s face part one time by the Defendant’s Roman.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Entry of the defendant in E in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect;

1. The application of the C’s written statement (in the case of the offense of insult of this case, the Defendant and his wife at the time recognized by the above evidence, the relation between the Defendant and his wife at the time, the contents of the bath, etc., are recognized as performing by the possibility of propagation, and the Defendant’s act violates the social rules, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion as to this

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Korea is against the defendant, and there is no record of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties.