2. In light of the following: (a) the Defendants were able to make a confession of the instant crime; (b) however, the instant crime was committed in violation of the Criminal Procedure Act; (c) the Defendants violated a deadly weapon on a mobile phone sales store, and thus, committed the instant crime; (d) the Defendants did not agree with the victims; and (c) all the Defendants were punished for the same crime; and (d) other circumstances, including the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, environment, motive or circumstance of the crime, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, including the sentencing guidelines, are too unreasonable since the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable. Therefore, all of the

3. In conclusion, since all of the defendants' appeals are without merit, they are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.