The lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant of the instant facts charged, and sentenced the Defendant not guilty on the grounds that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to prove the instant facts charged, and that there is no other evidence to prove it.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the evaluation of free evaluation of evidence and indirect evidence, or by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.