A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 10,000,00 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Defendant

A is a professor of G University H from April 201 to June 2015, who provided 19 research and development services, including “I,” and Defendant B is a professor of G University from June 2013 to June 2015, who provided 11 research and development services, including “K,” etc.

According to the regulations on the management, etc. of research and development projects, the regulations on research expenses of G University, and the guidelines on the management of research expenses of G University, etc., the victim G University Industry-Academic Cooperation Group (hereinafter “Industrial Cooperative Group”) shall be managed by being entrusted with the conclusion of industry-academic cooperation agreements with each ordering agency, such as government departments, and the execution of research expenses. If a person in charge of research claims payment of research expenses, such as personnel expenses, along with evidentiary documents, the project funds shall be executed. If there is a balance in the settlement of research expenses, or there is an amount wrongfully executed, the funds shall be collected and returned to each ordering agency. In particular, in the case of personnel expenses to be paid to a participating researcher, the G University Industry-Academic Cooperation Group, which is a research management department, shall comply with the relevant tax law and directly pay them to the account of the participating research institute. In order to ensure transparency in the protection of personal information and the management of research expenses, the head of the participating research institute’s account

1. On April 201, Defendant A: (a) in the case of personnel expenses to be paid to the Institute while providing research and development services on or around April 201, Defendant A cannot receive a refund from the said Institute under the pretext of joint management; and (b) he/she cannot receive a refund from the said Institute; and (c) notwithstanding the fact that the victim’s industry-academic cooperation is unable to be used individually, Defendant A filed a claim for a lower amount than the amount actually paid by the Institute’s personnel expenses, and