beta
(영문) 대법원 2013. 05. 09. 선고 2013두1799 판결

(심리불속행) 위약금을 수령한 시점에 소득세법상 과세대상이 되는 소득은 실현되었다고 봄이 타당함[국승]

Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2012Nu18921 ( December 27, 2012)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2009No3080 (No. 13, 2010)

Title

It is reasonable to view that the income subject to taxation under the Income Tax Act has been realized at the time of receiving penalty (incompetence of hearing).

Summary

(Main) It is reasonable to view that the income subject to taxation under the Income Tax Act has already been realized at the time when the plaintiff received penalty, regardless of the result of civil procedure or whether the crime of breach of trust is established against the plaintiff.

Cases

2013du1799 Global income and revocation of disposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

Gangwon A

Defendant-Appellee

Director of the District Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2012Nu18921 Decided December 27, 2012

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the appellate brief are examined, but the argument on the grounds of appeal by appellant does not include the grounds provided in each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal or it is recognized that there is no reason, and the appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act. It

Reference materials.

If the grounds for final appeal are not included in the grounds of appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violation of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal will not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final appeal, but will not proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds for final