If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. In around 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the place where a friendship member, such as C, is located in an insular place; (b) “D’s horse is Mam. D is Mam. D’s mother,” and (c) he loaded the rice stored in the house by means of truck at the Gu office, which used to capture it to the house; (d) rice dynasium; and (e) “D is a rice dynasium; (c)” and “D is divided into the investigation conducted by F with the accusation and then stolen the Kim Jong-T, which is the week, and kept by the Defendant. Kimdo youth.”, “A Donasium is an expert who will drink with a complaint or accusation.” By publicly pointing out false facts, the Defendant damaged the honor of the victim D by openly pointing out false facts.”

2. At around November 2012, the Defendant: “H” in the foregoing Hague shop’s employees and customers, such as I and J, from “H” located in the Geum-gu, Busan; “D’s horse is food and drinked, D is food and drinked,” and “We have stolen the rice located in the meal station and stored it in the house, and carried it into the truck at the Gu office. Rice Domins. Rice Domins are rice Domins.” “D, upon accusation by the Defendant, stolen and stored the Kim Jong-gu, which was divided into the investigation by the F.D., and the Defendant was covered by the criminal law.” “The Kimdo Youth is Kim Jong-gu.” “The Women’s Association member was a Domine with only one head at the time of the receipt, and was damaged beyond the head of the Tong, and the victim was a person who made a false accusation by pointing out that “D was a person who made a false accusation, as the victim’s complaint and accusation.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of the respective statutory provisions of the witness D, C, I, and J

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The summary of the charge under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is not guilty, is the date and time set forth in the judgment of the defendant.