[criminal power] On May 30, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court on August 8, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 8, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On October 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) on the early October 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (b) stated that the Defendant would pay off the loan money to the Defendant on a deposit basis with the victim F, who was parked in front of the entrance of the E church located in Jung-gu Busan, Jung-gu, Busan, that the Defendant would be viewed as working with the person located in Seoul; and (c) the cost of the work would need to be repaid on November 15, 2012.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay money to the victim since he was in a bad credit condition from July 2012 due to the failure of the Defendant’s management G, and was not able to receive money through Seoul.

The Defendant, as above, by deceiving the victim, received cash of KRW 1,00,000 from the victim, namely, the money borrowed from the victim.

2. On October 2012, the Defendant: “Around October 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) borrowed money in order to borrow money from Seoul would be well grounded in Seoul; (b) on November 15, 2012, the Defendant loaned KRW 2-30 million, including KRW 1 million borrowed prior to the E church as of November 15, 2012, to lend KRW 1.5 million.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay money to the victim since he was in a bad credit condition from July 2012 due to the failure of the Defendant’s management G, and was not able to receive money through Seoul.

As above, the Defendant, as well as the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received cash of KRW 1,500,000 from the victim, i.e., from the victim as a loan, at the seat, and received delivery of KRW 9,700,000 in total over 13 times from that time to December 28, 2012, as stated in attached Tables 2 through 14.

3. On January 3, 2013, the Defendant for the fraud of the borrowed money borrowed from the name of non-funded funds, phoneed to the victim on January 3, 2013, which was called “Seoul” to the Doro, v. Dogs and Dogggs that Dogs in Seoul.