beta
(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.09.12 2016나13565

보증금반환

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff regarding the amount of payment ordered below.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this part of the underlying facts is as follows, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment, except in the following cases: thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary Use] Defendant C shall be subject to “C”, and Defendant B shall be subject to both “Defendant” and “Defendant B”.

Part 5 to 7 below the 4th table "(based for recognition), without dispute, shall be written by Gap's 1 to 5, 7, 14, 16, 22 (including branch numbers, if available; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul's evidence 9, Eul's 1, 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings."

[Supplementary Parts] The following shall be added to Part 4 below the fourth Schedule:

The Daejeon District Tax Office, including the tax investigation on D, conducted a tax investigation on D with regard to D (including the period of suspension from July 1, 2014 to August 31, 2014) from July 11, 2014 to September 7, 2014 (including the period of suspension from July 21, 2014 to August 31, 2014) (the subject period: from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013); the imposition tax on omission in filing a report on the results of the investigation; the imposition tax on omission in filing a report on the results of the investigation was investigated at KRW 640,303,981; the fine for negligence on the violation of the obligation to issue cash receipts at KRW 1,234,303,930 (the period of notification of the results of the investigation was within 20 days after the completion of the investigation).

A criminal judgment against the defendant