A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months, for six months, for six months, and for four months, for each of the defendants C.

Defendant

On December 20, 2016, A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for special injury at the Gwangju District Court on December 20, 201, and the judgment was finalized on August 11, 2017.

Defendant

B On November 23, 2011, after being released on December 24, 2014 and released on April 25, 2015, the parole period was expired on December 23, 2015 while serving in prison for robbery, etc. in the Daejeon District Court's Branch of the Daejeon District Court on November 23, 201, and on October 27, 201, the judgment became final and conclusive on June 23, 2017.

Defendant

C On October 27, 2016, after being sentenced to one year of imprisonment for special injury, etc. by the Gwangju District Court, the judgment became final and conclusive on June 23, 2017.

1. On July 21, 2016, Defendant A was charged with a special injury, etc. and tried to proceed to trial at the Gwangju District Court 2016 High Court 2752, and Defendant A tried to break away from a new post by using the same violent organization as the Defendant at the time of the judgment of innocence in order to obtain a verdict of innocence.

E, etc. who suffered injury to E, etc.

C and B had a mind to ask the Defendant to testify as if there was no fact that the Defendant received the direction of “E et al.” from the Defendant.

A. On August 2016, the Defendant asked the Gwangju Northern District Court for the testimony to the effect that “No instruction was received from or made by the C from any investigation agency and any statement made by the investigation agency is merely the same as that written by reporting C’s protocol to the investigation agency,” from the Gwangju Northern District Office located in 49-43, the Defendant asked for the testimony to the effect that he would cause harm to B.

In fact, B made a false testimony to the effect that, on September 8, 2016, at the same place as C, the Defendant instructed C to open up a bridge, and that the Defendant did not command as described in paragraph 2 from the court of law No. 402 of the Gwangju Dong-gu, Gwangju District Court No. 402, which is a compliance officer of the Gwangju Dong-gu, and reported C’s protocol.

This is the defendant.