매매대금
1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
purport, purport, and.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for adding the following judgments as to the plaintiff's assertion under Section 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance under Section 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is identical to the part concerning the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance under Article 420 of the
2. Additional determination is that the Plaintiff purchased each land of this case for the purpose of development with permission for mountainous district conversion, and entered into the sales contract of this case by mistake that it is possible to use a road adjoining each land of this case, which is necessary for its development. As such, the Plaintiff asserts that the motive mistake is also a mistake in the so-called motive. Thus, in order to cancel the declaration of intent on the ground that the motive mistake falls under a mistake in the important part of the contents of a juristic act, it should be recognized that the motive is either indicated to the other party as the content of the declaration of intent or that the motive for the declaration of intent is the content of a juristic act.
It is insufficient to recognize that the motive or motive is the content of the instant sales contract, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion on this part is without merit.
3. Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, and all appeals against the Defendants by the Plaintiff are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.