However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant,

1. At the end of August 2018, at around 04:00, the victim C operated by Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as the “victim C”) and opened a dried window at the static point, without locking it into the static point and sticked to the static point, the credit cooperative shall annually dispose of 60,000 won in cash, which is owned by the victim in the

L. L. L.W. L. L.W.

2. On September 13, 2018, around 00:57, at the place indicated in paragraph (1) around 00:57, a credit cooperative consisting of the keys placed on the window by separating the shock network installed in the window and intrusion into the static point, and the credit cooperative shall annually collect 35,000 won in cash, which is owned by the victim within the credit cooperative;

L. B and L. L. theft.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (to attachCCTV video CDs);

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are against the defendant, the fact that there is no record of crime exceeding the fine, the fact that damage was restored and the injured person does not want the punishment of the defendant, and the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of the defendant's age, family environment, health conditions, etc.