2. The judgment was based on the following: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime and took an attitude against the Defendant; and (b) the Defendant appears to have partially contributed to the injury suffered by the victim B; and (c) the circumstances favorable to the Defendant.

However, in light of the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime, there are many records that the defendant was punished for the same criminal acts, and the defendant went to the crime of this case during the repeated crime period, and the fact that there seems to be no opening, and the victims' damages have not been recovered, etc., the court below's punishment cannot be deemed to be excessively unreasonable, in full view of all the sentencing conditions in the arguments of this case, including the defendant

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.