beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.20 2015가합511700

구상금

Text

1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 116,473,623 to the Plaintiff, and the period from August 26, 2014 to January 20, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a special corporation established by the Minister of Employment and Labor under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act to achieve the purpose of compensating employees for any occupational accident promptly and fairly through the implementation of the industrial accident compensation insurance project. The Plaintiff is an employer of the Plaintiff’s supplementary intervenor, Nonparty EB Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”).

(2) The Plaintiff’s Intervenor was employed as an employee in charge of the ship of Nonparty Company, while the Plaintiff’s Intervenor was employed as an employee in charge of the ship of Nonparty Company.

A person who has suffered an accident described in the subsection (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

3) At the time of the instant accident, Defendant B (hereinafter “instant insurance vehicle”) shall be the insurance vehicle of the instant case.

Defendant Samsung Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Samsung Fire”).

(B) The Plaintiff’s Intervenor entered into an automobile accident compensation insurance contract with the owner of the instant truck. (B) On March 2, 2012, the Plaintiff’s Intervenor called that the instant truck drivened by Nonparty D (hereinafter “instant truck”) among Non-Party Company’s vehicles transferred to the right from the G camping site located in the wife population F, and called the instant truck to the above place for the purpose of wearing the seal of the instant truck. Defendant B was requested to drive the instant insurance vehicle at the time of the instant truck towing work and went to the said place.

2. At the time, the truck of this case was loaded by using the voltage stringer, and the middle part of the above 2/3 of the stringer was teared. However, the Defendant B determined that the truck of this case should be loaded by completely cutting the remainder of 1/3 of the above stringer in order to tow the truck of this case.

However, the defendant B is a fluor.