No. 10, 11 of the seized evidence shall be returned to the injured party's name.

"2016 Highest 2913"

1. Fraudulent and larceny;

A. On January 22, 2016, around 15:38, the Defendant issued an order to the victim E, a business owner, as if he/she did not have an intent or ability to pay the food cost, to receive five (5) sons and two (2) sons in the market price of the victim E, and continued to break down 3 gallon phoness with the market price of 1 million won owned by the victim, which is located on the tables, using a galle lus where the victim’s surveillance was neglected, by placing an order to pay the food cost.

Accordingly, the Defendant received property equivalent to KRW 21,000 from the injured party, and stolen a mobile phone equivalent to KRW 1,00,000 from the injured party.

B. On April 22, 2016, around 16:45, the Defendant issued a food order to the “G” restaurant located in Busan Nam-gu, Busan, as if he did not have the intent or ability to pay the food price, to the victim H, the business owner of which would be able to pay the food price, and received three son, small 1 bottle, 1 bottle, and 1 malbbbb, with the market price equivalent to 11,500 won. On the other hand, the Defendant continued to break one mobile phone when he jumb, using the gap in which the victim’s surveillance was neglected, with the victim’s market price equivalent to 700,000 won.

As a result, the Defendant received property equivalent to KRW 11,500 from the injured party, and stolen the cell phone amounting to KRW 700,000, which is the victim's possession.

(c)

On May 24, 2016, the Defendant issued an order to the victim K, an employee, for food of KRW 10,700,000, for food of KRW 20,000 on the cell phone case owned by the victim and continued to receive KRW 20,000,00 in cash from the cell phone case owned by the victim, which was on the table, using the gap where the victim's surveillance was neglected, as if the Defendant did not have an intent or ability to pay the food of KRW 13:0 on May 24, 2016.

They go back.

Accordingly, the defendant is entitled to property equivalent to 10,700 won from the damaged person.