If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On November 6, 2015, the Defendant was proposing to lend KRW 1 million to a non-person who opened a mobile phone from his/her name and takes it as a security, and on November 6, 2015, the Defendant opened nine prepaid mobile phone units in the name of the Defendant at the mutual non-tel mobile communication agency located in Incheon Dong-gu around November 6, 2015, and on the following day, the Defendant in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul as of the ordinary distance, 9 prepaid mobile phone units in the name of the deceased.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for the purpose of telecommunications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written petition;

1. Answer to request the provision of communications data;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to applications for mobile phone membership;

1. Article 97 subparagraph 7 of the Telecommunications Business Act and Article 30 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;