Around October 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) up to October 1, 2013, “2014 Highest 529,” posted a false statement to the victim E, who read and contacted the article, stating that “The 4.30,000 won of the baby baby shall be sold at 4.30,000 won” to the victim E, who received 4.3 billion won from the victim’s deposit account in the name of the Defendant from the victim to the deposit account in the name of the Defendant on the same day as the price of the article; and (b) the fact that the purchaser did not possess the goods and paid the price of the goods through the Internet, even if the purchaser did not have the intent and ability to deliver the goods corresponding thereto; and (c) the purchaser obtained the total sum of 1,76,000 won from the victims through the Internet to the deposit account in the name of the Defendant by means of the aforementioned five times as shown in the attached Form (1) from December 11, 2013.

"2014 Highest 920"

1. On December 20, 2013, the Defendant against the victim F made a false statement to the victim F, who read the statement and contacted the statement to the effect that “The Defendant sold 110,000 won to 110,000 won” was transferred from the victim F to the national bank account (G) account (G) in the name of the Defendant on the same day as the price for the goods, even if the purchaser did not possess the goods and paid the price for the goods.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

2. On December 29, 2013, the Defendant against the victim H did not have the intent or ability to deliver the corresponding goods even if the purchaser did not possess the goods and paid the purchase price. The Internet NAB did not have the intent or ability to deliver the corresponding goods.