If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

On August 29, 2012, around 08:23, 2012, the Defendant written comments on the articles posted by the title “G final assistant, assistant, Doctrine and Doctrine” on the part of the bereaved family members who entered the deceased status F, the husband of the victim E (S) at the website following the following website, in the Internet newspaper, under the title “G final assistant, Doctrine, and gender display.”

가. 2012. 8. 29.경 "개값 나올거 그래도 kbs 한테 10원도 못받어! 너 같은 년들 때문에 일본이 한국을 우습게 보는거여!!"라는 내용을 게재하고,

나. 같은 날, 같은 방법으로 "솔직히 교통사고는 어쩔수 없는거지!! 그런 건 자동차 보험회사랑 얘기해야지!! 무슨 시위까지 하고 지랄 발광이냐 보통 교통사고 나서 죽었다고 시위하는 사람 있냐 돈 더 달라고 찌질하다 찌질해ㅉㅉ 진정성이 없어! 난 또 무슨 촬영장에서 낙마 같은 안전사고로 죽은 줄 알았네 ㅉㅉ"라는 글을 게재하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of the statutes governing evidential documents;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant's summary of his/her assertion appears to be an illegal demonstration that damages H's reputation, which is the Korean Broadcasting System and the supplier of G assistant investors, and that the victim's demonstration constitutes an illegal demonstration. The defendant's act is not unlawful since it does not go against social rules and is not against social rules.

2.