When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 21, 2016, at around 23:55, the Defendant: (a) heard the phrase “Isknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Hasknish Haskn, Lhnskhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhn

The Defendant continued to hear from the above D the word “Saman-si Sari-si Sari-si Sari-si Sari-si,” and continued to turn on the left side of the D.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning crime prevention and suppression of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and D;

1. Application of photographic materials and statutes on the place of service;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (to take into account that initial offenders and victimized police officers do not want the punishment of a defendant);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;