However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On May 22, 2013, the Defendant driven a B FD car at around 01:0, while driving the B B FD car and driving the road in front of the CF motherel in the north-gu two east-gu at the port at the port at the port at the port into two lanes from the intersection in front of the Joimera Hospital, to the North B B BL, and became a U-turn.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the front line and to safely operate the tea.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so at a place, other than the U.S. permitted area for U.S. U.S., caused the collision with the back part of the motor vehicle in parking, while he was driven by the victim C(24 years old) who was driving the U.S. one lane due to the negligence of driving the central line, driving the U.S. on the opposite lane. The front wheels part of the U.S., which was driven by the victim C(24 years old), was the front part of the motor vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as a spelke, which requires approximately 3 to 4 weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. The actual survey report on traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 3 (1) and Article 3 (2) 2 of the Act, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the reflection of the accused, the fact that the accused has agreed with the victim, and the fact that the insured has subscribed to a comprehensive insurance);