However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 13:40 on September 26, 2014, the Defendant sent a reporter to the “C Cosmetics” before the Dongdong-si, “I am frighting, I am frighting, I am frighting, I am to am. I am frighting from the slope belonging to the D District Unit of the Andong Police Station D District, which was called after receiving a report, and ambling the chest’s body, and assaulted the part of the Defendant’s left hand-hand part of the E with a hand-on hand-on hand-on hand-on hand-on hand-on hand-on hand-on hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (6-1-4 months) of obstruction of performance of official duties (6-1-4 months) (no person who has been specially punished] [decision of sentence] There are many violent criminal records against the defendant, the confession and reflect attitude of the defendant, and the degree of damage is relatively minor.