beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.05.15 2016가합54380

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The pertinent Plaintiff of the parties is a person who received medical treatment and surgery from a doctor affiliated with C Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), and the Defendant is the employer of the Defendant Hospital.

B. Around October 2014, the Plaintiff entered E Hospital located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E Hospital because the Plaintiff was out of her body and her body, and the Plaintiff’s symptoms were revealed, and it was necessary to undergo a close inspection at that time. On November 21, 2014, the medical staff at Defendant Hospital confirmed the Plaintiff’s hospitalization for brain ties or cerebral ties (TFCA) on December 1, 2014, and confirmed the method of the medical staff at Defendant Hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s treatment on the ground that the Plaintiff was suspected of brain ties’s brain ties or cerebral ties as a result of its implementation on December 1, 2014, and confirmed the method of the medical staff at Defendant Hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s treatment on the floor (TFCA) on December 2, 2014.

3) On December 12, 2014, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital explained the necessity, etc. for the surgery to the Plaintiff, who was within the hospital for outpatient treatment, and the Plaintiff determined to undergo the surgery on December 17, 2014, and hospitalized the Defendant Hospital. 4) The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital drafted the written consent for the surgery to the Plaintiff on December 17, 2014, and conducted the surgery on December 18, 2014 (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

C. After the surgery, the Plaintiff did not have any psychotropic loss, such as an internal visual disorder, before and after the surgery. After the surgery, the Plaintiff appealed against the left visual loss on the day of the surgery, and the medical personnel at Defendant Hospital claimed medical treatment for the same day of the surgery, and performed a narrow medical care for the same day, and observed the progress of the surgery with the 'after the internal examination on December 19, 2014,' by administering the 'after the 'PION', the dystrophism (PION)’, and the hystrophical medicine on December 27, 2014.