However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 28, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Suwon District Court’s Eunpyeong Site as well as a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 as a fine for the same crime in the same court on March 15, 2010.

On September 22, 2014, at around 23:30, the Defendant driven B car at a section of about 100 meters from the roads adjacent to the Ansan apartment in the same Han-dong, Ansan-dong, Ansan-dong, in the state of under the influence of alcohol of 0.177% of blood alcohol level.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reporting on the state of driving under the influence of alcohol and making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Records before judgment: Application of inquiries about criminal records, etc. and a copy of each summary order;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition in view of the fact that the defendant, with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, drives a motor vehicle in a state of considerable drinking alcohol even though he/she had the same history of driving at least twice, in light of the fact that he/she drives a motor vehicle in a state of considerable drinking, the criminal liability is very high. However, the defendant recognizes the facts charged in this case and reflects his/her wrongness, again, the defendant does not engage in driving a motor vehicle, there is no history of punishment exceeding the fine imposed on the defendant, and other circumstances shown in the records,