However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 01:00 on May 3, 2019, the Defendant was unable to have avoided a disturbance for about 30 minutes by c 'C' operated by the victim B(54 years of age) in Ansan-si (hereinafter omitted) on the ground that the victim said the victim as bad, making it difficult for the Defendant to have avoided a disturbance for about 30 minutes, such as making the victim cherbly fluencing a boom, setting on the table of the table, 1, and 2 bed up the floor of the floor, and hicking the victim into a large sound.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B written statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to records on site;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the following circumstances and Defendant’s age, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records.

The circumstances unfavorable: The defendant's mistake is recognized, and the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant under the agreement with the victim.