However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 27, 2017, around 06:30 on May 27, 2017, the Defendant sent the victim F (37 taxes) who is the head of the above main place of business at the 15th room of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D 1st floor of “E Entertainment 15,” the Defendant sent the above main place of business at the studio.

"Absing the victim's face by drinking, the victim's face was taken several times, and the two main diseases, which are dangerous objects in his/her table, was taken to the victim's part.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things with the victim's number of days of treatment, which led to the victim's inception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. A written statement;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (as to the wife inside the victim's inside of the victim);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act include: (a) the Defendant committed the instant crime without any particular reason at the gold entertainment shop, and (b) the Defendant committed the instant crime in the same kind of crime in particular, even though he/she appears to cause the death of a person at the entertainment shop around 2007, by causing violence at the entertainment center or the drinking house; (c) the period of suspension of the execution of two years and the surveillance of protection in June 2014; and (d) the period of suspension of the execution of two years and surveillance in June 2014; and (e) the Defendant who continued to commit the instant crime in the entertainment station shall be subject to strict punishment of the Defendant who committed the instant crime in the same manner without any specific reason.

However, a sentence is not imposed in consideration of the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant's use of the victim was not a dangerous object, and the fact that the defendant generally recognized the crime and misunderstanding appears to have been divided, and that it seems that the victim would have been paid KRW 10 million to the victim and that the victim would have reached a full agreement, but the protection and observation that contains special matters to be observed corresponding to the criminal liability, and community service is ordered.

. Other defendant.