except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 22:00 on November 27, 2019, the Defendant: (a) stated that the victim C (the 64-year-old) was boarding a taxi for D business purpose operated by the victim C (the 64-year-old) before the Daegu Suwon-gu apartment, and was driving on the front road of “G” located in the Daegu Suwon-gu F, and used the victim’s cryp, “I am, Chewing, why is, I am, I am am.” and used the victim’s rear part of the victim’s cryp on one occasion by drinking, and used the victim’s cryp with both hands.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. The Defendant, as stated in paragraph (1) of the same Article, committed assaulting a taxi engineer, and received 112 reports, and led to voluntary operation of the H district as well as I, who was affiliated with the H district unit of the Daegu Suwon Police Station.

On November 27, 2019, the Defendant, at the H District District in the Daegu Suwon-gu J around 22:27, 2019, heard that he would make a statement from the above circumstances I, saying, “We will be the information and staff of the Gyeongbuk-gu Gyeongmun-gu. We will be able to do so.” On his hand, the Defendant assaulted five times the part of the 1st half of the above circumstances I.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to I and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Attachment to global CCTV images);

1. Article 5-10 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The act of assaulting a driver of reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act in the suspension of execution is very dangerous in itself as a crime. Furthermore, the Defendant committed assault against a police officer to commit a crime, thereby admitting the nature of the crime. In addition, the Defendant appears to have a profound attitude to reflect in depth the perception of committing the crime. It does not