낙찰자 지위 확인의 소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning in this part of the basic facts is the same as that of “1. Basic Facts” under the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of “the judgment on the Defendant’s main defense” under the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. 2. The reasoning for this part of the judgment on the Defendant’s main defense is that of “the judgment on the Defendant’s main defense” under the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning for this part is the same as that of “the judgment on the Defendant’s main defense
3. Judgment on the merits
A. 1) The parties' assertion 1) The defendant's notice of cancellation of the successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's successful bidder's bid's bid's confirmation is sought since the plaintiff still holds a successful bidder's status in the bidding of this case. The defendant limited the qualification for participation in the bidding of this case to "a company with a single capacity of at least 5 metres/h (MVR) with a single capacity of at least one year's normal driving performance". The defendant's certificate of performance in this case submitted by the plaintiff cannot prove the result of the defendant'
B. In full view of the following facts or circumstances, the Plaintiff is a company with the supply performance required by the instant tender as a qualification for participation in the bidding, and it is recognized that the Plaintiff satisfies the substantive requirements related to the bidding, based on the instant performance certificate. In full view of the following facts or circumstances, the Plaintiff is deemed to have satisfied the requirements for the performance of the Plaintiff based on the instant performance certificate.