When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a Grandroth first-aid vehicle.

On June 6, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 12:20, and led the front of the viewing distance of 102, the viewing distance, from the view of the original correctional institution, to the view of the other original state, from the view of the prime correctional institution.

At that time, C had a duty of care to safely drive the car in accordance with the new code and prevent accidents due to the reason that C had a victim E (e.g., 56 years old) on the d SM6 car volume, and the above road is proceeding on the left-hand side from the right-hand side of the defendant's running direction to the left-hand side, and therefore a person engaged in driving duties of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely driving the motor vehicle in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to proceed in a direct manner in contravention of the signal, and caused the front part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle to shock the front part of the vehicle in front of the said C driving, as part of the back fences of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered the victim’s salt, tension, etc. in need of approximately two weeks’ medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, and reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) and proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act: Selection of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;