beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.12.21 2017가단11202

물품대금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted by the parties, as the Defendant and D supplied fire doors, etc. at the site of housing construction works executed by the Defendant and D, and completed the installation and construction, they seek the payment of the construction cost.

In regard to this, the defendant asserts that the plaintiff was only a transaction with the defendant's husband, but is not a direct transaction with the defendant, so it cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim.

B. We examine the judgment, and the evidence alone presented by the Plaintiff is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the construction contract on a fire door between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was concluded. It is difficult to accept the Plaintiff’s claim on the premise that there is no other evidence to acknowledge it

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.