2. Examining the various sentencing conditions of the instant case, the instant crime was committed by the Defendant, who was hospitalized due to alcohol dependence, was rejected from the hospital, thereby destroying two vehicles of employees parked at the hospital parking lot, and obstructed the performance of official duties by the police officers who were sent to the hospital after being informed of the disturbance in the bus terminal. After being hospitalized at the hospital and refusing going out of the hospital, the instant crime was committed not only by the victims of the instant crime, but also by the following: (a) the victims of the instant crime was committed not only by 7 prudents attached to the funeral hall cafeteria attached to the hospital and the plastic bag attached to the hospital before the hospital; (b) the victims of the instant crime were punished by a fine not exceeding 5 times in light of the process, method, frequency, etc. of the crime; (c) the fire-fighting crime was committed by the victims of the instant crime, and was committed not only by the victim of the instant crime, but also by the victim’s considerable damage to his life and property, and thus, by the victim’s considerable damage to the entrance of the instant hospital.