When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Around 01:00 on April 8, 2017, the Defendant: (a) took advantage of the gaps in which the victim E, who had drinking alcohol as referred to in subparagraph 505 in Gwangju Northern-gu, was under influence of alcohol, stolen with 50,000 won in cash owned by the victim and 800,000 won in the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of E;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act has the history of having been sentenced several times to imprisonment for the same thief crimes, and the defendant appealed immediately after being sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for a crime under this paper, and a decision to revoke the suspended sentence was made and temporarily suspended the validity of the decision to revoke the suspended sentence, and the victim who sit in the drinking place commits the crime of this case with many cash because the victim was breably under the influence of alcohol even though he was under the suspension of the suspended sentence, and the crime of this case is committed. The crime of this case is committed with no recovery from damage caused by the crime of this case, etc., which are disadvantageous to the defendant, and it is against the defendant's perception of committing the crime, and the defendant seems to have committed a thief crime under the influence of 10 years at the time of the crime of this case. The defendant seems to have committed a crime under the influence of thief without being considered by his parents at the time of the crime of this case, and the motive and circumstances of this case, etc.