except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 2, 2016, at around 10:45, the Defendant received 112 report that the Defendant assaultsd D at “C cafeteria” located in the Daegu Seo-gu B market, Seogu, Daegu, and received questioning of the police officer belonging to the Daegu Police Station E zone of the police station, Seogu, Police Station E zone, and called “C cafeteria,” and took a bath to said F as “C Y,” and took a part of the face face of the said F at one time.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted F, thereby obstructing police officers' legitimate performance of official duties on the duty of handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol to D and F

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no previous conviction or fine heavier than that of the same criminal offense or fine, and the extent of assault, etc.);