except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is the mother of the victim B (20 years of age) with a mental retardation Grade II.

1. On March 22, 2016, the Defendant became aware of the Defendant’s house of the Defendant, at around 14:00 on March 22, 2016, that the victim collected both waves from the two sides of the toilets, thereby preventing the victim from putting them in the two sides of the toilets, and that the victim sent them to other persons who affix his/her gender as a mobile phone.

The defendant, which is a dangerous object to alkin, had the victim's two arms and maglass part of the victim's knife of the material of alkinium (60 cm in length). The defendant put the victim on the part of the arms and the leg part of the treatment days.

2. On April 5, 2016, the Defendant, at around 21:30 on April 5, 2016, the victim was married with the victim on the ground that the victim had her speech to the owner with his/her own with his/her own will before towing in the instant place under the foregoing paragraph (1). On April 5, 2016, the victim got his/her own right arms.

The Defendant, as a lid of rice lid, which is a dangerous object to chemicalize (13 cm in diameter, 1.5 cm in thickness), spacked a part of the victim's body, and continued to be wheeled by both hand, the victim's face, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Entry of each police statement of the victim in each statement;

1. Descriptions of a medical certificate;

1. Application of each video statute of the victim's photograph and the tool to use the suspect's crime;

1. Article 258-2 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the degree of injury on the grounds of sentencing is not somewhat minor.

The defendant has four criminal records of violence.

However, there are circumstances that may be taken into account the background of the injury.

In addition, the age, occupation, family relationship, and post-crime of the defendant.