However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 29, 2013, the Defendant purchased KRW 2.5 million in advance of the member-gu C apartment shopping mall in Ansan-si around May 29, 2013, even though he/she knew that he/she was a stolen victim E-owned mobile phone price of KRW 13 million, and he/she purchased KRW 2.5 million in advance of the victim E-owned market, which he/she was aware of the fact that he/she was stolen.

6. 14. Supper 14. Supper 14. He purchased the victim E-owned mobile phone amounting to KRW 500,000,00,000 with knowledge that the market price of the victim E, which D stolen at the same place, was 2 million.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired stolens in collusion with the person who was not injured in name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (subject matters of inspection);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 362 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 20

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;