When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 16:32 on December 4, 2017, the Defendant, as a result of a dispute between the victim D (the 62 years of age, south) and the consignee, was seated and brought about as a matter of the settlement of construction cost at the office of "C," located in "C," which is located in "C," which is located in "C," which is located in "C," and brought about an injury to the victim, such as the victim's knee, knee, knee, knee, knife, and open character, while coming from the her will, and continued to knee the victim's knife with his hand, and caused the victim's face by drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Protocol of examination of the witness witness D;

1. The written diagnosis of injury (the defendant claimed that he was only the victim at the time and did not have any time when the victim was the victim. However, this court's duly adopted evidence that the victim appealed to the hospital as follows, namely, the victim's right after the following day of the case to the hospital that "a bridged from a fish control office to a hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hyd hh", and the victim filed a complaint with the defendant around June 1, 2018, but the victim stated that he was the victim who was the victim at the time of undergoing a police investigation as a suspect status on December 111, 2017

(3) The application of the law to the victim’s statement is recognized in light of the following: (a) the victim’s statement is deemed to have credibility; and (b) the victim’s statement is deemed to have been sentenced to a fine only for

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;