Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of violating the National Land Planning and Utilization Act among the facts charged in the instant case, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on changing the form and quality of land for farming or by misapprehending the rules of logic and experience, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.