손해배상(기)
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
Judgment of the first instance.
1. On June 201, the Plaintiff, in collusion with the Codefendant C (hereinafter “C”) and Non-Party D, purchased a motor vehicle under D’s name in collusion with the Defendant, the husband of the first instance trial (hereinafter “C”), and purchased a motor vehicle under D’s name. The Plaintiff, upon obtaining a loan under the Plaintiff’s name, did not cause any damage to the Plaintiff, such as transferring the name of the owner of the C, and repaying the loan.” On June 24, 201, the Plaintiff entices the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff was liable for damages incurred to the Plaintiff due to the tort, on the ground that it did not arbitrarily sell the relevant motor vehicle without transferring the name of the Plaintiff, and that it was jointly and severally liable for damages incurred to the Plaintiff due to the Plaintiff’s repayment of the loan, automobile loan, administrative fine, etc.
The facts that D, as alleged by the plaintiff, deceiving the plaintiff and caused damage to the plaintiff are not disputed between the parties, but by the statements in Gap evidence 9-1, Eul evidence 1-2, and Eul evidence 1-2, and each testimony of witness D and witness F of the court below, the following circumstances are as follows: (i) although C, as alleged in the above, was accused of fraud by asserting that the plaintiff suffered losses due to Eul's illegal acts as alleged by the plaintiff; (ii) C was subject to a non-prosecution disposition by the investigative agency to the effect that it was not suspected of suspicion by the investigation agency; and (iii) D was subject to a non-prosecution disposition by the court below, not a cooperation by the plaintiff with the knowledge that it was deceiving the victims, but a person who borrowed the name in connection with the purchase of the vehicle and received
He misleads himself C.
I, through C, have the people.