2. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion that the defendant and his defense counsel had an ordinary beauty art act, and the defendant, as a normal beauty art act, did not expand the hair in front, or attempted to commit an indecent act by using violence or intimidation, and did not intend to commit an indecent act by force.

This article argues that "....."

3. Among the evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor, the evidence as shown in the facts charged in the instant case includes G’s statement and video images of CCTV images when committing the crime.

In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the above evidence, there was an intention that the Defendant had objectively committed an act of causing sexual humiliation or aversion to the general public and contrary to good sexual morality.

It is difficult to see it.

① The Defendant, as a beauty artist, has increased for about 20 minutes the hair of G.

According to the above images, the Defendant 16:22 to 16:33 on the day her back hairs and side hairs from 16:33 to 16:33:03 on the day, and 16:3:13 to 16:33:2 on the right side of G, the Defendant she was her at the front of the right side of G.

In this case, the defendant's grandchildren did not contact with the defendant's grandchildren because they are located in the kacker's knife.

I seem to appear.

In other words, the Defendant rhythm the right side and the back side, and between 16:34:35 and 16:34:50, the Defendant rhym the body of the Defendant, rhys the hair, and rhys the hair into the front side of the right.