용역비
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants is modified as follows. A.
The Defendants are attached Form 1.3 to the Plaintiff.
1. The plaintiff filed the lawsuit of this case against the defendants and the co-defendant D, F,O, X, and AI (the status of the co-defendant in the first instance trial is not separately indicated) in the attached Table 1 allocation table. The first instance court accepted the plaintiff's claim against D, F,O, X, AI, and defendant R in the entirety, while the defendant's claim against D, F,O, X, AI, and the first instance court stated in the attached Table 1 allocation table in the attached Table 1 allocation table, and the defendant's claim against the defendant, C, E, G, H, I, H, I, J, K, K, M, M, N, P, Q, Q, Q, T, U,V, Z, Z, AB, AC, AE, AF, AF, AP, AP, AP, AM, AM, AM, AM, AM, AM, AM, AM, AM, AM, AM, M, AM, M, or any damage from the defendants.
Since the plaintiff and the defendant R only appealed, the scope of the judgment of this court is 1,55,705 won as to the defendant R, which is the full amount of the plaintiff's claim, and as to the remaining defendants, it is limited to each money listed in the attached Table 1 allocation table (e) of attached Table 1, which is the part cited by the judgment of the court of first instance as to the remaining defendants, excluding each money listed in the attached Table 1 allocation table (b) and (A), which is the part cited by the court of first instance as to the remaining defendants.
2. The reasoning for this part of this Court is as follows: (a) the Defendant management body is deemed to be a management body; and (b) the corresponding part of the reasoning of the first instance judgment [1. Basic Facts] is the same as that of the relevant part of the reasoning of the first instance judgment, except where the Defendant AV is used as “AV,” respectively; and (c) this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article
3. Determination as to claims against the Defendants
A. The reasons for this part of this Court’s claim for service costs (as to Defendant R), are as follows: (a) the Defendants are used as “Defendant R”; and (b) the Defendant’s management body as “management body,” respectively; and (c) the relevant part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance (as to Defendant R, “3. A’s claim for service costs”) is the same as that of the relevant part of the judgment of the first instance.