The defendant is a person who operates a medical care institution for senior citizens called "D".

On November 12, 2009, the Defendant purchased a commercial building in Suwon-si E from F, and filed a lawsuit against the said victim on April 6, 2010 on the ground that the victim G (n, 60 years of age) who was living on the second floor of the said building did not put the said building at the place.

1. At around 16:00 on April 8, 201, the Defendant: (a) opened a entrance door that was not corrected to ascertain whether the said victim had gone to the said victim’s house located on the second floor of the said commercial building; and (b) entered the said house to intrude into the said victim’s residence.

2. On April 9, 2011, the Defendant: (a) opened and intruded the entrance door to the said victim’s house in order to perform the internal construction work; and (b) caused the damage to the Defendant by having the waste disposal business entity dispose of, on the part of the victim’s possession, 1 electric axiss, 1 table table, 3 private fluor, 3 private fluor; (c) 30 private fluor, 1 television, 1 wallet (including intermediate size), 10 private fluor; (d) 2 private fluor, 3 air bags; (e) 6 private fluor; (e) fluor; (e) 1 private fluor; and (e) fluor, 1 private fluor; and (e) fluor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and H;

1. Details of telephone communications;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 319 (1) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 3,000,000 to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that there is no history of punishment for the Defendant, and the victim, prior to the occurrence of the instant case, left a part of his articles while leaving the same before the same month, and the Defendant got a director.