조합원제명결의무효확인
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for a change as prescribed in paragraph (2).
The 4th 10th 10th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 3th 3th 3th 3th 4th 2th 3th 3th 3th 4th 200
The following shall be added at the end of 5 pages 2:
Nevertheless, the Defendant allocated only 2.46% of the total quantity, which is less than the quantity requested to be changed, to the Plaintiff.
The 5th parallel 6th parallel 6th parallel 7th parallel 5th parallel 5th parallel 7th parallel 5th parallel 5th parallel 7th parallel 5th parallel 5th parallel 6th parallel 7th parallel 5th parallel 7th parallel 7th parallel 7th parallel 7th parallel 7th parallel 7th parallel 7th parallel 7th parallel 9th parallel 9th parallel 9th parallel 9th parallel 9th parallel 5th parallel 9th parallel 9th parallel 5th parallel 99, where the plaintiff is a business entity with a place of business in the city of Gyeyang-gu, the main area of the plaintiff's main business is the area of the area of the mountain, which is not the area of the mountain, and the defendant classifys the plaintiff as the area of the mountain zone. However, this is merely a form and separate from the area of the mountain zone, and it is difficult to conclude that the plaintiff actually managed the area of the company as a business entity.
Furthermore, the Plaintiff’s allocated volume has decreased from 6.38% to 2.46%, while D companies also have a 50% of the supplied site volume, including the supplied site volume, and E companies have a place of business in gold, and there is doubt about fairness in allocating a increased quantity of more than 70% including the supplied site volume to the Plaintiff.
From 5 pages to the end of the parallel, 6 to the end shall be as follows:
⑤ The Defendant did not have to reduce the actual allocated volume to the Plaintiff by refusing to return or allocate the allocated volume without good cause.