beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2016.11.09 2016고정202

폭행등

Text

All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Defendant B and Defendant A are related to the victim D’s head and the mother. A.

On March 23, 2016, the Defendants, in front of the court of Suwon District Court No. 4 separate court No. 203, 120 of the Suwon-si World Cup 14:00, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon District Court No. 203, the victim D (the age of 41) filed a bankruptcy exemption lawsuit against Defendant A, a mother, became the victim outside of the court after the filing of a bankruptcy exemption lawsuit.

Defendant

A, on the ground that the victim brought a lawsuit against himself/herself, assaulted the victim's left shoulder part of the victim's left shoulder on one hand.

Defendant

B, according to the victim boarding the elevator, “finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite,” but the victim find the victim’s chest fin

B. Defendant A’s insult, at the same time and at the same place as in the above “1” above, should not openly insult the victim at a place where there are 20 to 30 persons who participated in the court by referring to as “the victim’s scam, card scam, scambling, scambling, and scambling the victim’s scam.

2. The card 2 multiple cards and 2. The card 2.2 was used to see the victim's public interest.

2. Of the facts charged against the Defendants in the form of assault, the charge of assault against the clearly expressed will of the victim is a case that cannot be prosecuted. The insult is a case that can be prosecuted only upon the victim’s complaint. The victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the Defendants in this court on October 24, 2016, which was after the prosecution of the instant case, and can be recognized as the fact that the complaint was revoked. Thus, all prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 5 through 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.