However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On May 24, 2009, the Defendant forged a private document forgery and uttering of the private document under the name of E, a private document for the purpose of using the document in the lessor’s free signature and use of the document in the lessor’s column, stating in the form of the real estate lease contract, “FAPT 104 Do 1602 Do 104 Do 1602 Do 104 Do 302 at the location, Gyeonggi-do Ha-do Ha-do n-do n-do n-do n-e n-e, the date of preparation,” and “E” in another real estate lease contract, stating in the form of the other real estate lease contract, “FF Do n-104-1602 n-e, Gyeonggi-do n-do n-e, the date of preparation,” and providing the lessor’s signature and seal for the purpose of uttering of the real estate lease contract.

2. As described in paragraph (1), when providing two copies of the forged real estate lease agreement as collateral to the victim, the defrauded G provided that “When he/she subrogated for the amount of KRW 6 million to H, he/she shall return the name of the lessee of the F apartment 104 Dong 1602, Hanam-si, Hanam-si, which is living in the amount of KRW 9 million as deposit in subrogation, to the victim,” which was caused the victim to substitute the Defendant’s obligation by remitting the amount of KRW 60 million to H on May 26, 2009.

On the same day, the Defendant continued to receive KRW 10 million from the victim by making a false statement to the effect that “The deposit previously provided as security is KRW 90,000,000,000,000.”

In addition, the defendant provided the victim as security on August 5, 201.