식품위생법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two million won of fine) by the lower court is unreasonable.
2. The judgment of the court below is not reasonable on the grounds that the defendant's criminal facts are divided while committing the crime, there is no criminal records, and the first-class disabled are acknowledged, but the size of entertainment establishments operated without permission is large, the operating period is extended to a long time, and the punishment of the court below seems to be imposed in consideration of all the circumstances favorable to the defendant as seen earlier. In light of all the circumstances surrounding the crime of this case, the circumstances leading up to the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's occupation, character and conduct, etc., and various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments, it cannot be deemed that the
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.