A. Defendant A shall pay KRW 13,252,954 and KRW 10,00,00 among them from September 3, 2006 to the date of full payment.

A. On May 22, 2001, Onnuri Agricultural Cooperatives (hereinafter “Seoul Agricultural Cooperatives”) loaned KRW 13,000,000 per annum, ① interest rate of KRW 6.5% per annum, annual interest rate of KRW 15% per annum, and due date of payment as of May 22, 2006, to the Network D (hereinafter “the deceased”), and loaned KRW 17,000,000 per annum, annual interest rate of KRW 5% per annum, annual interest rate of KRW 15% per annum, and due date of payment as of May 22, 2011 (hereinafter “each of the instant loans”). The Plaintiff issued a credit guarantee certificate so that the Deceased may obtain each of the instant loans from the Godo Cooperative according to the credit guarantee agreement with the Deceased.

B. The Deceased died on October 10, 2001, and the Deceased’s property was inherited by Defendant A’s 3/9 shares, E, and Defendant B and C, respectively.

C. When the plaintiff was seeking reimbursement from the Hansan Agricultural Cooperatives, for which the benefit of each of the loans in this case was lost, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendants and Eul at the Daegu District Court Young-gu District Court on October 13, 2005 to seek reimbursement from October 6, 2005, and on January 17, 2006, the above court rendered a judgment that "the plaintiff is entitled to 13,252,954 won, and the defendant Gap is entitled to 10,000 won from the above court as to 8,835,303 won and 6,66,666 won each of them are 14% interest per annum from October 7, 2005 to the day of full payment (the judgment of the Daegu District Court Decision 2005Da25297, May 16, 205)."

On April 3, 2006, after the judgment of this case became final and conclusive, the Plaintiff received 3,807,746 won from the Daegu District Court’s Young-gu District Court’s Young-gu District Court’s Young-gu Real Estate Auction case regarding each real estate inherited by the Deceased, and the said money was appropriated for damages for delay from October 7, 2005 to September 2, 2006.

E. After that, E has fully repaid the remainder of the reimbursement obligation under the instant judgment, but the Defendants have up to now the remainder of the reimbursement obligation.