2. In full view of the following factors: (a) the determination of the lower court’s sentencing is deemed to fall within the reasonable scope of discretion; and (b) there is a change in the conditions of the sentencing when it comes to the final judgment, in addition to the fact that the Defendant had a number of criminal records, including the same criminal records, and the applicable sentences.

Considering the fact that it cannot be seen, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable because it is too large.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.