However, this judgment has become final and conclusive against Defendant A.

Defendant

A is the actual business owner of the K's massage treatment establishment located in the Heak-gu J in Cheongju-si, and Defendant F is the business owner in the name of the above massage treatment establishment in the name of the person with disabilities at class 6. Defendant B, E, C, and D are the employees of each above massage treatment establishment.

1. 피고인 A, F, B, E의 공동범행 피고인 A는 2014. 4. 17.경부터 2014. 9. 28.경까지, 피고인 F, 피고인 B은 각 2014. 4. 17.경부터 2014. 5. 2.경까지, 피고인 E은 2014. 4. 중순 일자불상경부터 2014. 5. 2.경까지 위 안마시술소에서, 안마방 20개, 성교행위를 하는 탕방 5개를 갖추고, 피고인 A는 위 안마시술소의 실제 업주로 업소를 전반적으로 관리하고, 피고인 F은 피고인 A에게 사업자 명의를 대여하고, 피고인 B, 피고인 E, 종업원인 L은 손님을 안마방과 탕방으로 안내하여 여성 종업원인 C, M, D, N로 하여금 불특정 다수의 남성 손님들과 성교행위를 하게 한 후, 그 대가로 손님들로부터 숏타임(성교행위시간 40분) 13만 원, 기본(성교행위시간 60분) 18만 원, 투샷(2회의 성교행위시간 80분) 20만 원을 받아 약 920만 원 상당의 수익을 올렸다.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the above L, thereby arranging sexual traffic.

2. On May 2, 2014, around 00:19, Defendant C promised to receive KRW 80,000 in return for sexual traffic and engaged in sexual traffic by engaging in sexual traffic by promising to receive KRW 80,00 in return for sexual traffic.

3. Defendant D

A. On May 1, 2014, around 08:36, the Defendant promised to receive KRW 80,000 in return for sexual traffic, and engaged in sexual intercourse with 40-half males who are customers, and engaged in sexual intercourse once.

B. On May 2, 2014, around 00:19, the Defendant promised to receive KRW 80,000 in return for sexual traffic and engaged in sexual traffic by engaging in sexual traffic by promising to receive KRW 80,000 in return for sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. C, M, D, N, E, L, B, P, P, Q, R, F, S, T, and U.