2. The judgment of the defendant recognized the crime of this case and against his mistake, provided personal information of women who are the other party to the opposite to the opposite to the opposite to the opposite to the opposite to the opposite to the opposite to the opposite to the defendant at the latest, and the primary crime without criminal history until now is favorable to the defendant

On the other hand, in order to prevent various problems that may arise after marriage in the situation where international marriage is increasing, it seems necessary to provide accurate personal information to the parties of marriage in advance, and the fact that the fees received in return for the marriage brokerage of this case are not many are disadvantageous to the defendant.

Considering the above circumstances and the various circumstances, which are the sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.