사기
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of the following: (a) the gist of the grounds for appeal: (b) the Defendant led to confessions and reflects; (c) the Defendant was a flat company that has faithfully worked at one-six (16) years’ work place; (d) the Defendant is in a position to support the father and two children who are disabled persons; and (e) the Defendant paid 44 million won out of the amount of damages in this case to the Victim C; and (e) the Defendant paid 44 million won out of the amount of damages in this case, the sentence (one year and
2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, considering the fact that the amount of damage caused by the act of deceitation in this case reaches 190 million won in total, and that the Defendant did not reach an agreement with the victim C up to the trial, and only partially repaid the amount of damage, and that there is no particular change in circumstances in the trial, and all other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the lower court is unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.