When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On August 10, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the Suwon District Court No. 211, which was 120, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and 15:30 on August 10, 201, and tried as a witness of the Defendant’s case (hereinafter “case subject to perjury”).

The defendant has illegally entered this section.

At the same time, the prosecutor's question of "not having reported to the police" that "the witness was unable to admit him/her, he/she had key, and the witness was hospitalized in the hospital at that time.

"At the best risk of the hospital" in the presiding judge's question "whether D opened and entered the army on November 5, 2015."

The testimony was made on November 5, 2015, and the testimony was made to the effect that “the entry of E and F into the building on November 5, 2015 was false to the effect that he/she was not aware of the case by hospitalized in the hospital and was not aware of the case,” to the prosecutor’s question “I cannot know well because he/she entered the hospital.”

However, on November 5, 2015, the Defendant opened the door of G building with E and entered it into the key, and there was no fact that he was hospitalized in the hospital.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A copy of witness examination protocol of a case subject to perjury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the National Health Insurance Corporation, the border regional headquarters of the relevant case subject to perjury;

1. Article 152 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 153 of the Criminal Act to mitigate confessions;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. There is no record of punishment in addition to the minor fine, which has long been sentenced twice for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Before the case subject to perjury becomes final and conclusive, this case.