양수금
1. The Defendant’s annual interest in KRW 100,000 to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff, as well as in relation thereto, from November 1, 2013 to June 18, 2015.
1. The plaintiff filed a claim against the defendant since he transferred his claim against the defendant to the plaintiff succeeding intervenor during the lawsuit of this case. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant is without merit.
2. The plaintiff's successor's claim
A. Indication of Claim: The same is as indicated in the reasons for the claim (However, ‘creditor' is considered as ‘Plaintiff', ‘debtor' as ‘Defendant', and ‘debtor' as ‘Defendant') and the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor acquired the claim against the Defendant under a contract of acquisition of assets between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on January 16, 2015.
(b) Judgment by service (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);